Vasko Electric Inc safety record at a glance
Vasko Electric Inc has been the subject of 8 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Sep 28, 2001 and Mar 30, 2023. 3 of them were accident inspections. 2 of them produced citations, 4 in all: 0 serious. Inspectors proposed $24,500 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $17,950. The largest single penalty, $17,250, came from an inspection opened Feb 8, 2006 in Sacramento. That places the employer at #8,234 of 122,853 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction. Worksites in Roseville, Sacramento, Marysville, Citrus Heights, Lincoln, Rocklin.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2023 | Roseville | Programmed related | 1 citation | $700 | Jun 13, 2023 |
| Sep 6, 2022 | Sacramento | Referral | no citations | $0 | Sep 30, 2022 |
| Aug 16, 2012 | Marysville | Programmed related | no citations | $0 | Sep 7, 2012 |
| Feb 8, 2006 | Sacramento | Accident | 3 citations | $17,250 $23,800 proposed | Sep 9, 2008 |
| Feb 8, 2006 | Sacramento | Accident | no citations | $0 | May 22, 2006 |
| Aug 21, 2003 | Citrus Heights | Complaint | no citations | $0 | Nov 18, 2003 |
| May 3, 2002 | Lincoln | Accident | no citations | $0 | Oct 22, 2002 |
| Sep 28, 2001 | Rocklin | Planned | no citations | $0 | Mar 8, 2002 |
Also recorded as: Vasko Electric; Vasko Electric Inc.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 3646, Operating Instructions (Elevating Work Platforms): 2 citations, $17,000
- 8 CCR 1675, Ladders, general: 1 citation, $700
- 8 CCR 342, Reporting serious injuries and deaths: 1 citation, $250
Accidents investigated
Local pages: Roseville employment lawyer, Sacramento employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement; where it was reduced, the amount the inspector first proposed is shown under it. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Vasko Electric Inc
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 4, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.