U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service safety record at a glance
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service has been the subject of 7 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between May 17, 2007 and Aug 15, 2023. 3 of them were planned inspections. 4 of them produced citations, 6 in all: 3 serious. Inspectors proposed $0 in penalties, and that total stands. That places the employer at #86,334 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Public Administration; Other Services (except Public Administration); Transportation and Warehousing. Worksites in Sacramento, Loleta, San Diego, Stockton.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2023 | Sacramento | Programmed other | no citations | $0 | Sep 11, 2023 |
| Sep 8, 2022 | Loleta | Planned | 2 citations | $0 | Oct 24, 2022 |
| Aug 20, 2012 | San Diego | Programmed related | 2 citations 2 serious | $0 | Oct 15, 2012 |
| Nov 21, 2011 | Sacramento | Complaint | no citations | $0 | Nov 23, 2011 |
| Jan 20, 2009 | Sacramento | Complaint | 1 citation | $0 | Aug 24, 2010 |
| May 21, 2007 | Sacramento | Planned | 1 citation 1 serious | $0 | Jul 9, 2007 |
| May 17, 2007 | Stockton | Planned | no citations | $0 | May 17, 2007 |
Also recorded as: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; US Fish & Wildlife Service.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 1910.305, Wiring methods, components, and equipment for general use: 2 citations, 2 serious
- 8 CCR 1910.215, Abrasive wheel machinery: 1 citation, 1 serious
- 8 CCR 1910.242, Hand and portable powered tools and equipment, general: 1 citation
- 8 CCR 1960.69: 1 citation
- 8 CCR 1910.212, General requirements for all machines: 1 citation
Local pages: Sacramento employment lawyer, San Diego employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement; where it was reduced, the amount the inspector first proposed is shown under it. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 4, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.