Soltek Pacific Construction safety record at a glance
Soltek Pacific Construction has been the subject of 11 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Apr 10, 2002 and Jul 19, 2024. 8 of them were planned inspections. 1 of them produced citations, 1 in all: 0 serious. Inspectors proposed $0 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $0. That places the employer at #86,334 of 122,854 California employers in the database by penalties. It also appears in 1 federal wage and hour case.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction. Worksites in Fresno, Lemoore Naval Air Station, Chula Vista, San Diego, Monterey, Travis Afb, Camp Pendleton, San Luis Obispo.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Proposed | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2024 | Fresno | Unprogrammed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Nov 7, 2024 |
| Sep 16, 2020 | Lemoore Naval Air Station | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Sep 18, 2020 |
| Aug 1, 2018 | Lemoore Naval Air Station | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Aug 30, 2018 |
| Dec 15, 2017 | Chula Vista | Unprogrammed related | no citations | 0 | 0 | Jun 20, 2018 |
| Feb 24, 2016 | San Diego | Planned | 1 citation | 0 | 0 | Jun 7, 2016 |
| Jun 4, 2015 | San Diego | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Sep 23, 2015 |
| Aug 26, 2014 | San Diego | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Dec 4, 2014 |
| Sep 13, 2011 | Monterey | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Sep 13, 2011 |
| Sep 12, 2011 | Travis Afb | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | Oct 19, 2011 |
| Apr 7, 2009 | Camp Pendleton | Planned | no citations | 0 | 0 | May 28, 2009 |
| Apr 10, 2002 | San Luis Obispo | Complaint | no citations | 0 | 0 | Apr 24, 2002 |
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 1926.502: 1 citation
Local pages: Fresno employment lawyer, Chula Vista employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Proposed is the penalty the inspector assessed; penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Soltek Pacific Construction
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 1, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.