S W Gill Inc safety record at a glance
S W Gill Inc has been the subject of 5 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between Aug 3, 2004 and May 19, 2006. 3 of them were complaint inspections. 3 of them produced citations, 11 in all: 2 serious. Inspectors proposed $7,410 in penalties, and that total stands. The largest single penalty, $5,220, came from an inspection opened Dec 16, 2004 in Huntington Beach. That places the employer at #18,463 of 122,853 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction. Worksites in Huntington Beach, Los Angeles.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2006 | Huntington Beach | Follow-up | no inspection made | $0 | May 19, 2006 |
| Dec 16, 2004 | Huntington Beach | Planned | 4 citations 2 serious | $5,220 | open |
| Nov 12, 2004 | Los Angeles | Complaint | no inspection made | $0 | Nov 22, 2004 |
| Aug 3, 2004 | Los Angeles | Complaint | 5 citations | $1,400 | Apr 25, 2017 |
| Aug 3, 2004 | Los Angeles | Complaint | 2 citations | $790 | open |
Also recorded as: S W Gill Inc.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 5194, Hazard communication: 2 citations, $525
- 8 CCR 3642, Platform Equipment: 1 citation, 1 serious, $2,475
- 8 CCR 3646, Operating Instructions (Elevating Work Platforms): 1 citation, 1 serious, $2,475
- 8 CCR 1512, Emergency medical services (construction): 1 citation, $515
- 8 CCR 3204, Access to Employee Exposure and Medical Records: 1 citation, $350
- 8 CCR 5144, Respiratory protection: 1 citation, $350
- 8 CCR 1509, Injury and Illness Prevention Program (construction): 1 citation, $275
- 8 CCR 5155, Airborne contaminants: 1 citation, $175
Local pages: Huntington Beach employment lawyer, Los Angeles employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement; where it was reduced, the amount the inspector first proposed is shown under it. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at S W Gill Inc
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 4, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.