Cahill Contractors, Inc. safety record at a glance
Cahill Contractors, Inc. has been the subject of 54 Cal/OSHA inspections in California since 2000, opened between May 24, 2002 and Apr 15, 2026. 39 of them were planned inspections. 8 of them produced citations, 16 in all: 0 serious. Inspectors proposed $25,695 in penalties; after appeals and settlements the current total is $21,940. The largest single penalty, $7,600, came from an inspection opened Feb 22, 2023 in San Francisco. That places the employer at #5,810 of 122,853 California employers in the database by penalties.
Industry as coded by the inspecting office: Construction; Other Services (except Public Administration). Worksites in Oakland, Hayward, San Rafael, San Francisco, Berkeley, Union City.
Every inspection, newest first
Click a date for the citations in that inspection.
| Opened | City | Why | Result | Penalty | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2026 | Oakland | Planned | no citations | $0 | May 22, 2026 |
| Mar 6, 2025 | Hayward | Planned | no citations | $0 | May 9, 2025 |
| Aug 21, 2024 | San Rafael | Unprogrammed related | no citations | $0 | Feb 3, 2026 |
| Feb 22, 2023 | San Francisco | Planned | 2 citations | $7,600 $7,800 proposed | Jul 28, 2025 |
| Mar 25, 2022 | San Francisco | Complaint | no citations | $0 | Apr 15, 2022 |
| Mar 14, 2022 | Berkeley | Unprogrammed related | 1 citation | $450 $935 proposed | Jun 27, 2022 |
| Mar 1, 2022 | Berkeley | Planned | no citations | $0 | Mar 30, 2022 |
| Dec 27, 2018 | San Francisco | Complaint | 1 citation | $0 $500 proposed | Nov 14, 2019 |
| Oct 27, 2017 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Nov 7, 2017 |
| Sep 1, 2017 | San Francisco | Unprogrammed related | no citations | $0 | Dec 11, 2017 |
| Apr 21, 2017 | San Francisco | Accident | no citations | $0 | May 22, 2017 |
| Jan 26, 2017 | San Francisco | Accident | no citations | $0 | Mar 30, 2017 |
| Jan 9, 2017 | San Francisco | Unprogrammed related | no citations | $0 | Feb 3, 2017 |
| May 18, 2016 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Jun 1, 2016 |
| Feb 5, 2016 | San Francisco | Unprogrammed related | no citations | $0 | Mar 14, 2016 |
| May 27, 2014 | San Francisco | Planned | no inspection made | $0 | Jun 4, 2014 |
| May 23, 2012 | Oakland | Unprogrammed related | 4 citations | $6,050 $8,620 proposed | Sep 17, 2013 |
| Feb 17, 2012 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Feb 17, 2012 |
| Aug 18, 2011 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Aug 24, 2011 |
| Jul 15, 2011 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Jul 27, 2011 |
| Jul 15, 2011 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Jul 26, 2011 |
| May 11, 2010 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | May 13, 2010 |
| May 6, 2010 | Union City | Accident | 1 citation | $935 | May 3, 2012 |
| Mar 8, 2010 | San Francisco | Unprogrammed related | no citations | $0 | Sep 2, 2010 |
| Mar 8, 2010 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Mar 10, 2010 |
| Oct 13, 2009 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Oct 19, 2009 |
| Aug 24, 2009 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Aug 28, 2009 |
| Jul 29, 2009 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Jul 29, 2009 |
| Mar 11, 2009 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Mar 13, 2009 |
| Dec 22, 2008 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Dec 22, 2008 |
| Jul 11, 2008 | Berkeley | Planned | no citations | $0 | Jul 14, 2008 |
| Jun 7, 2008 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Jun 7, 2008 |
| Apr 8, 2008 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Apr 8, 2008 |
| Feb 2, 2008 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Feb 2, 2008 |
| Feb 1, 2008 | Berkeley | Planned | no citations | $0 | Feb 1, 2008 |
| Nov 30, 2007 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Dec 3, 2007 |
| Jul 21, 2007 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Jul 28, 2007 |
| Jul 17, 2007 | Berkeley | Planned | no citations | $0 | Jul 17, 2007 |
| May 9, 2007 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | May 9, 2007 |
| Apr 10, 2007 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Apr 10, 2007 |
| Dec 5, 2006 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Dec 5, 2006 |
| Aug 3, 2006 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Aug 3, 2006 |
| Nov 10, 2005 | San Francisco | Complaint | 5 citations | $1,680 | Sep 26, 2006 |
| Jun 23, 2005 | San Francisco | Complaint | 1 citation | $225 | Jul 1, 2006 |
| May 20, 2005 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Jun 2, 2005 |
| Mar 14, 2005 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Mar 14, 2005 |
| Jan 8, 2005 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Jan 24, 2005 |
| Sep 25, 2004 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Sep 25, 2004 |
| Jul 14, 2004 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Jul 16, 2004 |
| Jun 5, 2004 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Jun 28, 2004 |
| Nov 16, 2003 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Mar 10, 2004 |
| Jul 3, 2003 | San Francisco | Accident | 1 citation | $5,000 | Apr 26, 2006 |
| Jan 7, 2003 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | Jan 14, 2003 |
| May 24, 2002 | San Francisco | Planned | no citations | $0 | May 31, 2002 |
Also recorded as: Cahill Contractors; Cahill Contractors Inc; Cahill Contractors Inc.; Cahill Contractors, Inc; Cahill Contractors LLC; Cahill Contractors, LLC.
The rules this employer was cited under
- 8 CCR 1532.1, Lead (construction): 5 citations, $1,680
- 8 CCR 1626, Scaffolds: 2 citations, $5,450
- 8 CCR 1630, Elevators for Hoisting Workers: 2 citations, $225
- 8 CCR 1712, Requirements for Impalement Protection: 1 citation, $7,000
- 8 CCR 342, Reporting serious injuries and deaths: 1 citation, $5,000
- 8 CCR 1509, Injury and Illness Prevention Program (construction): 1 citation, $935
- 8 CCR 1621, Railings and toeboards (construction): 1 citation, $600
- 8 CCR 3214, Stair rails and handrails: 1 citation, $600
Accidents investigated
Local pages: Oakland employment lawyer, Hayward employment lawyer.
How to read this record
Each row is one inspection by Cal/OSHA (or, rarely, federal OSHA) of one worksite. Why is the reason it was opened. Penalty is the current figure after any appeal or settlement; where it was reduced, the amount the inspector first proposed is shown under it. "Serious" means a realistic possibility of death or serious harm; "willful" and "repeat" carry penalties up to $162,851 each.
Citations document that the employer was told, in writing, what the rule required and when. That knowledge is often the center of a retaliation case: a worker who complained about the hazard an inspector later cited, and was then fired or cut, has a Labor Code 6310 claim, with lost wages and attorney's fees.
Full explainer: how to read a Cal/OSHA record.
If you work, or worked, at Cahill Contractors, Inc.
Write down what you reported, to whom and when, and what changed afterward: shifts, pay, duties, write-ups. Request the inspection file from the Cal/OSHA district office using the activity number on the inspection page. An injury goes through workers' compensation; a firing, demotion or threat after a safety complaint or injury report is an employment claim with a one-year deadline at the Labor Commissioner (Labor Code 6310) and a longer one in court. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088 or send what you have.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, California inspections. Record last checked Nov 4, 2026. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.