What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a planned inspection of Caffe Classico Foods LLC at 2500 Annalisa Drive, Concord (Contra Costa County) on Jun 27, 2007. It was a partial inspection focused on safety hazards. 22 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 11 citations (7 serious) and proposed $5,880 in penalties; the current total is $5,880. 5 citations were deleted on appeal and are not counted. The case closed on Mar 5, 2008. The employer has 1 other inspection on its California record.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $0, current $0. 3 instances. 22 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 17, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $0, current $0. 2 instances. 22 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 17, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $0, current $0. 3 instances. 9 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 17, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $75, current $75. 6 instances. 12 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 17, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $1,350, current $1,350. 6 instances. 22 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 24, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $1,350, current $1,350. 2 instances. 13 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 24, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $1,350, current $1,350. 3 instances. 10 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 24, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $135, current $135. 10 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 24, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $135, current $135. 3 instances. 10 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 24, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $135, current $135. 10 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 24, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $1,350, current $1,350. 8 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 24, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $150, current $0. 22 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 17, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $150, current $0. 22 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 17, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $150, current $0. 22 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 17, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $150, current $0. 9 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 17, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Aug 17, 2007. Proposed $135, current $0. 2 instances. 9 workers exposed. Abatement due Aug 24, 2007, completed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 309679108. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 309679108, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.