What happened in this inspection
Cal/OSHA opened a planned inspection of East Bay Sign CO. Inc dba Borden Decal at 207 Eleventh St., San Francisco (San Francisco County) on Mar 30, 2006. It was a complete inspection of the worksite focused on health hazards. 18 employees were recorded at the site. Inspectors issued 16 citations (6 serious) and proposed $3,840 in penalties; the current total is $3,840. The case closed on Oct 30, 2006.
Citations
Each citation names the rule, its classification and the penalty as proposed and as it stands now.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $150, current $150. 4 instances. 15 workers exposed. Abatement due Oct 22, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $0, current $0. 8 instances. 15 workers exposed. Abatement due Oct 22, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $0, current $0. 11 instances. 15 workers exposed. Abatement due Oct 22, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $150, current $150. 2 instances. 15 workers exposed. Abatement due Oct 22, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $75, current $75. 16 workers exposed. Abatement due Oct 22, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $0, current $0. 4 instances. 16 workers exposed. Abatement due Oct 22, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $0, current $0. 6 instances. 16 workers exposed. Abatement due Oct 22, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $0, current $0. 16 workers exposed. Abatement due Oct 22, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $75, current $75. 8 instances. 14 workers exposed. Abatement due Oct 22, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $150, current $150. 3 instances. 15 workers exposed. Abatement due Oct 22, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $1,350, current $1,350. 7 instances. 13 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 29, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $1,350, current $1,350. 11 instances. 13 workers exposed. Abatement due Oct 13, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $135, current $135. 2 instances. 13 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 29, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $135, current $135. 3 instances. 13 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 29, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $135, current $135. 2 instances. 13 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 29, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Issued Sep 22, 2006. Proposed $135, current $135. 2 instances. 13 workers exposed. Abatement due Sep 29, 2006, completed. Read the rule.
Your rights
If you worked at this site, the inspection file is a public record once the case closes; request it from the Cal/OSHA district office with activity number 301087722. A worker who reported the hazard, the injury or the inspection and was then fired, demoted or cut has a retaliation claim under Labor Code 6310, one year to file with the Labor Commissioner and longer to sue. Injuries themselves go through workers' compensation. Free, confidential review: (800) 371-3088.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data, inspection 301087722, checked Nov 1, 2026. How to read a record. Back to the safety tracker.
About this data: Records come from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement datasets (inspection, violation, accident and accident injury tables), which carry Cal/OSHA's state-plan inspections alongside federal ones. We load every inspection of a California worksite opened since January 1, 2000 and refresh it weekly. Employer names, addresses and industry codes are as the inspecting office recorded them; similar names are grouped where they clearly refer to the same employer. A citation can be reduced, vacated or withdrawn on appeal, and an inspection can stay open for months, so a record can change. Penalties shown as "current" reflect the latest status in the federal file. This page is public information about the employer's regulatory record, not legal advice and not a statement that any person was harmed or any law broken beyond what the record states.